(1.) The petitioner is the creditor. He has filed this petition in which he is challenging the award made by the Debt Settlement Offi- cer under the Gujarat Rural Debtors Relief Act 1976 and confirmed by the Appellate Officer:
(2.) Respondent No. 1 2 and 3 owned to the petitioner decretal Debt amounting to Rs. 7 500 They applied to the Debt Settlement Officer under the Act in which they contended that on the appointed day they were marginal farmers and that therefore their debt was extingui- shed. Respondents Nos. 1 2 and 3 by executing an agreement of sale had charged their land with repayment of the debt which they owed to the petitioner. The Debt Settlement Officer held that respondents No. 1 2 and 3 were on the appointed day marginal farmers and that therefore their debt was extinguished. He ordered that the agreement of sale which respondents Nos. 1 2 and 3 had executed in favour of the petitioner had become unenforceable and therefore void.
(3.) The petitioner appealed against that award to the Appellate Officer. He dismissed the appeal and confirmed the award.