SUNIL Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The petitioner has preferred this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to get the custody of muddamal vehicle being Hyundai Eon Era Car having registration number GJ-05- JR-7875, which is seized by police in connection with FIR being C.R.No. 11210063200286 of 2020 registered with Singanpore - Dabholi Police station, District : Surat for offences punishable under sections 65(A)(E), 98(2) and 81 etc. of the Gujarat Prohibition Act.

(2.) Learned advocate for the petitioner, submits that the petitioner being the owner of muddamal vehicle moved an application under section 451 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 ['the code for short] before the learned 5 th Additional Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate First Class, Surat for interim custody of the vehicle during the pendency of the Trial of the case. The learned Magistrate, by his order dated 06.11.2020, rejected the application essentially on the ground of bar contained in section 98(1) of the Prohibition Act and the quantum of sentence prescribed for the offence. However, the petitioner did not assail the order of the learned Magistrate by preferring the criminal revision application in the Sessions Court and directly approached this Court with the present petition.

(3.) Rule returnable forthwith. Learned APP waives service of notice of rule on behalf of the respondent-State. With consent of the learned advocates for the parties, the matter has taken up for final disposal today.