G C DAVE Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Mr.D.C. Raval, learned advocate for the petitioner points out that thought the order of reversion was quashed and set aside by this Court in earlier petition filed by the petitioner being Special Civil Application No.5743 of 1986, the authorities have not given any consequential benefits. Mr.Raval further submits that it is a matter of settled legal position that once the order of reversion is quashed and set aside by this Court, the authorities ought to have granted the consequential benefits to the petitioner inasmuch as after the order of reversion is quashed, it becomes non existent. However, the petitioner is not granted consequential benefits. Pursuant to the rule issued by this Court on 11.1.2000 an affidavit in reply is filed by respondent no.1 wherein it is mentioned in para 3 that,

(2.) There is no other defence and possibly there is none available to the respondents.

(3.) The respondents are directed to calculate the consequential benefits payable to the petitioner in light of the judgement and order of this Court in earlier Special Civil Application No.5743 of 1986 dated 4.3.1997, latest by 19th June 2000 and in case there is no stay is obtained against the judgement and order of this Court dated 4.3.1997, the respondents shall pay the same to the petitioner within a further period of six weeks, i.e. by 31.7.2000.