(1.) As in all these three matters, the grounds raised for challenge of the order of termination of services of the petitioners and the facts are almost similar, the same are being taken up for hearing together and are being disposed of by this common order.
(2.) In Special Civil Application No. 4578 of 1990, this Court had not protected the petitioner by grant of interim relief. However, in two other matters, interim relief has been granted in favour of those petitioners and they are continuing in service. Leading arguments in these three matters were advanced by Shri A. V. Trivedi, learned Counsel for petitioner in Special Civil Application No. 4578 of 1990. Those arguments have been adopted by Ms. Sejal Sutaria appearing for petitioners in two other matters.
(3.) It is not in dispute that the petitioners were given appointments as Class- IV by respondent No. 2 at the Civil Hospital, Mehsana.