LAWS(CE)-2003-12-327

HINDUSTAN POWER INSTRUMENTS Vs. COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE

Decided On December 23, 2003
Hindustan Power Instruments Appellant
V/S
COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) This is an application by M/s. Hindustan Power Instruments (Pvt.) Ltd. for waiver of pre -deposit of Central Excise duty amounting to Rs. 74,144.94 paise.

(2.) At the outset Shri U Raja Ram, learned Department Representative pointed out that the Commissioner (Appeals) has dismissed the Appeal filed by the Applicants on the ground of Appeal being barred. Shri N.K. Singh, learned Consultant on the other hand submitted that after receipt of the Order -in -Original confirming the demands, the Applicants had filed a Civil Writ Petition No. 4691/03 in Delhi High Court; that the Delhi High Court vide order dated 28.7.2003 dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to take recourse to the statutory remedy; that the High Court also directed that if the petitioner prefers Appeal within 10 days from today, their application for condonation of delay shall be considered favourably by the Appellate Tribunal; that as the High Court's order has been received by them on 6.8.2003, they had filed the Appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) on 13.8.2003 which is within 10 days time provided by the High Court. The learned Consultant, further, submitted that as the High Court's order was received by them only on 6.8.2003, they could not file the Appeal within 10 days allowed by the High Court; that considering the peculiar circumstances involved in the case, delay, is very insignificant and the appeals needs to be considered favourably for condoning the delay else grave injustice will be carried out.

(3.) Learned Departmental Representative opposed the prayer by saying that the Hon'ble High Court's direction were very specific to prefer the Appeal within 10 days from today, i.e. 28.7.2003 and as the Appeal had been filed much beyond the time limit of 10 days given by the Hon'ble High Court, it was not open to the Commissioner (Appeals) to condone the delay; that the Applicants should have sought the extension of time for filing the Appeal from the Hon'ble Court.