LAWS(UTN)-2018-4-89

SARIK AHMAD Vs. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

Decided On April 04, 2018
Sarik Ahmad Appellant
V/S
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) This C-482 petition has been filed by the applicant for quashing the charge sheet dated 10.02.2017 (Annexure No. 2) and the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No. 1222 of 2017, State Vs. Sarik Ahmad pending in the Court of learned A.C.J.M. 2nd , Dehradun.

(2.) First information report was lodged by the opposite party no. 2-complainant on 16.10.2016 at P.S. Patel Nagar District Dehradun against the applicant with the allegation that applicant told the complainant that he is the owner of a plot and he wants to sell it. Applicant made an agreement with the complainant on 17.06.2016 and received Rs. 50,000.00 from the complainant. On 13.10.2015, he again received Rs. 1,40,000.00 from the complainant. But later on, it came to the knowledge of the complainant that applicant is not the owner of the plot and he cheated the complainant. On the basis of the FIR, a criminal case no. 359 of 2016 has been registered at P.S. Patel Nagar, District Dehradun against the present applicant. The Police has investigated the matter and submitted the charge sheet on 10.02017 against the applicant. On the basis of the charge sheet, learned A.C.J.M. IInd Dehradun registered a Criminal Case No. 1222 of 2017 and passed the summoning order under section 420 I.P.C. on 27.03.2017.

(3.) Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has falsely been implicated in the instant case. He submits that offence under Sec. 420 of Penal Code is not made out against the applicant and he never cheated the complainant. He submits that learned lower court without considering the material available on record wrongly summoned the applicant. Learned counsel for the applicant further submits that that now the parties have entered into compromise and the matter has amicably been settled. He annexed the copy of the settlement deed as Annexure No. 3 to the petition.