LAWS(UTN)-2016-7-32

MANIK GHOSH Vs. SOHAM INNOVATIVE VENTURE

Decided On July 12, 2016
Manik Ghosh Appellant
V/S
Soham Innovative Venture Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The respondent has filed a complaint under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Champawat against the present applicant and another co-accused, namely, Pankaj Bhagat, who were the employees of M/s Nyimi Enterprises. The allegation against the present applicant is that he issued a cheque of Rs. 20,00,000/- (Rupees Twenty Lakh Only) in favour of the complainant/firm, which was subsequently dishonoured due to "insufficient fund". Subsequently, on the basis of the statement of the complainant as well as other documents available before the learned Magistrate, summon has been issued to the present applicant vide order dated 02.01.2012. Aggrieved by the said order, the applicant preferred revision before the learned Session Judge, Champawat, which was ultimately rejected vide order dated 15.12.2015. Hence, the present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicant, invoking the inherent jurisdiction of this Court.

(2.) Heard Mr. B.S. Adhikari, learned counsel for the applicant and perused the records.

(3.) It is an admitted fact that the alleged cheque bears the signature of the present applicant. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as the fact that the court below has only issued summons to the applicant, this Court is not inclined to interfere in the present matter as far as the proceedings are concerned. The proceedings shall go on before the court below, in accordance with law. However, the applicant would be at liberty to raise all legal and factual submissions before the court below, in case need so arises. At this stage, this Court finds the present matter is premature to make any kind of interference.