LAWS(UTN)-2005-8-18

VOLLEYBALL FEDERATION OF INDIA,JAWAHARLAL NEHRU STADIUM,CHENNAI AND ANR. Vs. UTTARANCHAL VOLLEYBALL ASSOCIATION THROUGH D.K.SINGH SACHIV BRAHSPATI SPORTS ACADEMY & ORS.

Decided On August 05, 2005
Volleyball Federation of India,Jawaharlal Nehru Stadium,Chennai and Anr. Appellant
V/S
Uttaranchal Volleyball Association through D.K.Singh Sachiv Brahspati Sports Academy And Ors. Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS revision, preferred under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, is directed against the order dated 8-11-2004 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Rudrapur (Udham Singh Nagar) in Civil Suit No. 3 of 2004.

(2.) BRIEF facts of the case are that, a Civil Suit No. 3 of 2004 was instituted by respondent No. 1, Uttaranchal Volleyball Association, through its Secretary, Sri D.K. Singh for declaration and injunction against the revisionists (defendant Nos. 1 and 3 and other defendants). In said suit it was pleaded that plaintiff (respondent No. 1) is a society, registered under Societies Registration Act, which selects the Volleyball players for representing the State for national and international events. Defendant No. 1 (present revisionist No. 1) and defendant No. 5 (respondent No. 4) organize various events of Volleyball and recognize the various Volleyball Associations. Plaintiff/respondent No. 1 is attached with the defendant No. 1 (revisionist), and defendant No. 5 (respondent No. 4) has also given its recognition to it. It is alleged by the plaintiff - defendant No. 1 in his plaint that no confidence motion was moved on 22-9-2002 against the then President, defendant No. 3, Avdhesh Chaudhary, for his activities against the plaintiff organization and new President was elected in his place. However, the defendant No. 1 (revisionist) is still recognizing the defendant No. 3, Avdhesh Chaudhary as President of the plaintiff organization. Hence, suit for declaration and injunction that the Executive elected on 22-9-2002 should be recognized and defendant No. 1 or defendant No. 3 should not interfere in the working of the plaintiff organization.

(3.) I heard learned Counsel for the parties and perused the record.