VEEKAY SINGH Vs. UTTARAKHAND TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY

JUDGEMENT

(1.) AS prayed, four weeks' time is granted to the respondents to file counter -affidavits. List four weeks hence. In Writ Petition No. 79 (M/S) of 2014 [with W.P. No. 73 (M/S) of 2014], the Co -ordinate Bench of this Court directed on 8.1.2014, as under:

(2.) WHEN this Court made a query from learned Counsel for respondent No. 1, he replied that respondents No. 3 and 4 have not deposited half of the examination fee from its own funds, as was directed by learned Vacation Judge on 8.1.2014 and, therefore, the Uttarakhand Technical University has not permitted the students to appear in the examination. When learned Counsel for respondents No. 3 and 4 was confronted with the question as to why half of the examination fee has not been deposited, learned Counsel submitted that they have deposited Rs. 3 lac as half of the examination fee from its own funds. Learned Counsel for respondent No. 1 thereafter contended that an amount of Rs. 36 lac is still outstanding against respondents No. 3 and 4, to be paid as half of the examination fee. He admitted that Rs. 3 lac has been deposited by respondents No. 3 and 4, who wanted the break up/details of such calculation, to which learned Counsel for respondent No. 1 submitted that he can do so only if some time is granted to him by this Court for the same. So, the controversy between respondents No. 3 & 4 and respondent No. 1 is regarding the calculation of half of the examination fee/which can be sorted out by the Court in the course of hearing of the present writ petition.

(3.) IT is accordingly reiterated and provided what was directed by the Coordinate Bench of this Court on 8.1.2014 without entering into the controversy, as of now, as to whether Rs. 36 lac is still required to be deposited by respondents No. 3 and 4 (the fact remains that Rs. 3 lac has been deposited by respondents No. 3 and 4 with respondent No. 1), which controversy shall be adjudicated upon by the Court at an appropriate occasion, as the same requires exchange of pleadings between the parties.