RAJESH GOYAL Vs. MADHU RANI

JUDGEMENT

(1.) For the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the delay condonation application, the delay condonation application is allowed and the delay of 15 days in preferring this appeal is condoned.

(2.) The appellant assails the order dtd. 15/12/2021 passed by the Family Court, Dehradun in Case No.329 of 2019. By the impugned order, the Family Court has rejected the application moved by the appellant-husband under Sec. 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act for seeking maintenance from the respondent-wife.

(3.) The case of the appellant is that he is 50% disabled and is unable to earn his livelihood. On the other hand, the respondent, it appears, is serving in the Irrigation Department of the State. The application was opposed by the respondent by stating that she alone had taken the responsibility of bringing up her two daughters. The first one has married by spending about Rs.25.00 Lakhs. She has also taken loan for the said wedding. She is meeting all the expenses in respect of second daughter. The appellant has ancestral property i.e. agricultural land in his name in village patti Gadar, District Kaithal. The appellant rather than liquidating the said property to meet his expenses is demanding maintenance from the respondent-wife. According to the respondent, the appellant is in the habit of drinking and gambling and the money provided by her in the past was used for the said habits of the appellant.