UMESH KUMAR Vs. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) An interim order was passed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court on 20/12/2021, which also included protection of the property. It is brought to our notice by Mr. Aditya Singh, the learned counsel appearing for the private respondent (i.e. respondent No. 5), that a civil suit is pending between the parties as regards the same property, and the application, filed for a temporary injunction, has already been rejected.

(2.) Mr. J.S. Virk, the learned Deputy Advocate General for the State of Uttarakhand, submits, with reference to a General Diary Entry dtd. 15/6/2022 and on instructions, that the petitioners does not require protection for his life, but asks for police protection whenever he enters the disputed property.

(3.) In that view of the matter, we are of the opinion that the present writ petition is not maintainable as the dispute is civil in nature.