LAWS(UTN)-2012-9-63

SETU THAPA Vs. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

Decided On September 19, 2012
Setu Thapa Appellant
V/S
State of Uttar Pradesh (now State of Uttarakhand) Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS appeal, preferred under section 374 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short Cr.P.C.), is directed against the judgment and order dated 28.01.2000, passed by II Additional Sessions Judge, Dehradun, in Sessions Trial No. 17 of 1999, whereby said court has convicted accused/appellant Setu Thapa under section 376 read with section 511 IPC (i.e., attempt to commit rape), and sentenced him to rigorous imprisonment for a period of five years and directed to pay fine of Rs. 5,000/ -. Heard learned Amicus Curiae for the appellant, learned counsel for the State, and also perused the lower court record.

(2.) PROSECUTION story in brief is that Smt. Surema Rana (P.W. 1) is a widow who lives in Shiv Nagar, Ajabpur Kala, within the limits of Police Station Dalanwala, Dehradun, alongwith her minor daughter Suman Rana (P.W.2). On 23.12.1998, at about 4:00 p.m., accused/appellant Setu Thapa said to have enticed away Suman Rana (P.W.2), aged eight years towards jungle near her house, and attempted to commit rape on her. The girl told about the incident to her mother. Next day, P.W.1 Surema Rana went to the house of accused/appellant Setu Thapa and complained about his conduct to his parents. On 25.12.1998, family members of the accused/appellant Setu Thapa came to the house of Surema Rana and requested her not to complain about the matter to the police and requested for compromise. However, Surema Rana did not agree for compromise, and gave first information report (Ex. A1) on 25.12.1998, to Senior Superintendent of Police, Dehradun. On the basis of said report crime No. 460 of 1998, was registered at Police Station Dalanwala. Investigation was taken up by Sub Inspector G.S. Manola, who interrogated the witnesses, inspected the spot and submitted charge sheet against accused Setu Thapa for his trial in respect of charge of offence punishable under section 376 read with section 511 IPC.

(3.) P .W.2 Suman Rana, a child witness aged nine years told that on the day of incident she was called by accused Setu Thapa from her house and he took her to nearby jungle. The witness has further narrated that the accused took out her under garments, and thereafter put out his underwear. The girl was made to lie down on the ground. It is further stated by P.W.2 Suman Rana as soon as accused attempted to commit rape, she got up whereafter accused asked her not to tell about the incident to anyone.