LAWS(UTN)-2011-5-38

AMAR SINGH BISHT Vs. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

Decided On May 09, 2011
Amar Singh Bisht and Ors. Appellant
V/S
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Smt. Shobha Bisht filed a First Information Report. The ingredients of offences alleged in the said First Information Report were such that, if proved, the same would attract punishments under Sections 498A, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The First Information Report led to investigation, whereupon a charge sheet has been filed. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Udham Singh Nagar has taken cognizance on the charge sheet and thereupon issued a bailable warrant against the accused persons.

(2.) The informant has, in the meantime, compromised with all accused persons. Offences punishable under Section 504 and Section 506 of the Indian Penal Code are compoundable in terms of Section 320 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Offences punishable under Section 498A and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act are not compoundable.

(3.) In the First Information Report, allegation by the wife was not only confined to the husband, but was also directed against other members of the family of her in-laws. By reason of the compromise, the wife has returned to her matrimonial home and is residing with her husband and in-laws in peace. In the circumstances, the husband, the wife and other in-laws of the informant have jointly filed this application seeking a direction to bring to an end the matters complained of in the said First Information Report. On an earlier occasion, the applicants herein approached this Court and brought to the notice of the Court that they have entered into a compromise, when this Court directed the parties to approach the trial court. At that stage, the Court was only concerned with the compromise and not compounding of the offences. The Court felt that compromise itself is such that the same may give adequate relief to the parties.