NARENDER KUMAR PANT Vs. STATE OF UTTARANCHAL

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS revision has been directed against the judgment and order dated 11.2.2003 rendered by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pauri Garhwal in Criminal Appeal No. 9/98, Narender Kumar Pant v. State. In the said appeal, the judgment and order of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Pauri Garhwal dated 31.1.1998 was confirmed which was delivered in Criminal Case No. 155/97. In the said trial court case, accused revisionist was convicted for the offence of Section 337 Indian Penal Code, 1860 and was asked to undergo six months' imprisonment nay the fine of Rs. 500/ -. He was further convicted for the offence of Section 304 -A Indian Penal Code, 1860 and was asked to undergo one year's rigorous imprisonment nay the fine of Rs. 4500/ -.

(2.) THE learned Counsel for the revisionist does not advance any arguments towards the merits of the case but only has prayed mercy for the condonation of the term of sentence of imprisonment. It has also been prayed that if in the opinion of the Court deemed proper, then the fine may be enhanced in lieu of condonation of the sentence of imprisonment. The learned Counsel has also apprised this Court that initially the revisionist has been in gaol for 8 days at the time of his first remand and later after failure of his appeal in the Sessions Court till the acceptance of his bail bonds in pursuance of the bail order passed by this revisional court, he has been under incarceration for 21 days. This way he has already undergone 29 days' incarceration. The incident is also of 3.10.1995. Thus, the revisionist is facing the criminal proceedings at various levels since then and passing under an anguish.

(3.) WITH the modification as above in the impugned judgments and orders passed by the courts below, this revision is partly allowed.