LAWS(UTN)-2010-12-7

UTTARAKHAND GRAM PRADHAN SANGATHAN Vs. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

Decided On December 20, 2010
UTTARAKHAND GRAM PRADHAN SANGATHAN Appellant
V/S
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) IN view of the provisions contained in Article 243-E of the Constitution of INdia, there is no concept of Administrator of any Panchayat, but since the Government, by a notification, while postponing election of Panchayats, appointed Administrators, the present batch of writ petitions, in the form of Public INterest Litigations, were filed.

(2.) THE Government having taken the stand that what it has done is permissible in terms of the law made to that effect, the question, which is to be decided, is whether sub-section (3-A), inserted in Section 12 of the Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1947 and in Sections 8 & 20 of the Uttar Pradesh Kshettra Panchayats and Zila Panchayats Act, 1961, by the Uttaranchal Panchayat (Amendment) Act, 2002, is valid or not. A look at Article 243-E would make it abundantly clear that the term of every Panchayat is five years and no more. THE said Article mandates that before expiry of the term of Panchayat, election of new Panchayat, who would succeed the existing Panchayat, should be completed. That being the situation, there is no scope of appointment of an Administrator, nor there is any scope of extension of an existing Panchayat. When the constitutional mandate is that an election to constitute a Panchayat shall be completed before expiry of the duration of the existing Panchayat, there is no question of providing in the Act, dealing with the subject made by the State Legislature, anything contrary to completion of election of a Panchayat before the time specifically mentioned in the Constitution. THEre is, therefore, no premise to proceed on the basis that it is not practicable to hold election to constitute a Gram Panchayat or a Kshettra Panchayat or a Zila Panchayat within the time as specified in Article 243-E of the Constitution of India and, accordingly, to do something, which has not been provided, either expressly or impliedly, in the said Article and expressly negatived the same in so many words.

(3.) WE, accordingly, dispose of these writ petitions. Order accordingly.