LAWS(KER)-2019-7-124

THE KSHATRIYA KSHEMA SABHA Vs. THE ELECTION COMMISSION

Decided On July 09, 2019
The Kshatriya Kshema Sabha Appellant
V/S
The Election Commission Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The Kshatriya Kshema Sabha claims to be a registered organization (under which enactment ? It is not stated in the writ petition) filed this writ petition seeking the following reliefs:-

(2.) Essentially, the grievance projected in the writ petition pertains to the rejection of the request to permit the Melsanthis of Sabarimala and Malikappuram Temples to cast postal vote or to provide them polling stations in the said temple premises by the Chief Electoral Officer. Ext.P3 to that effect came to be passed on a request in writing for the said purpose by the State General Secretary of the petitioner organization. As per Ext.P3, he was informed that postal ballot could be permitted only in the case of officers deputed for polling duty and such request could not be acceded. The petitioner seeks for quashment of Ext.P3 and also for issuance of a writ of mandamus commanding the respondents to provide polling stations solely for the Melsanthis of Sabarimala and Malikappuram Temples at Sabarimala for the upcoming Lok Sabha elections. With respect to the second prayer virtually, it is not now surviving. Obviously, the said election is over. Therefore, the surviving questions in this writ petition are whether Ext.P3 letter invites interference and whether the petitioner is entitled to seek for issuance of a writ of mandamus commanding the respondents to make permanent arrangements to ensure voting facility to the Purappeda Santhis of various temples of the State of Kerala, including Sabarimala and Malikappuram.

(3.) The first respondent filed a statement taking up the contention that the writ petition is not maintainable. Furthermore, it is stated therein that franchise being an individual's statutory right the petitioner organization cannot maintain a writ petition carrying such prayers. As regards the request for providing polling stations, it is stated that Section 25 of The Representation of the People Act, 1951 (for brevity 'R.P Act' only) deals with the issue and as a matter of right, none can seek for establishment of a polling station at any particular place and it is for the authorities concerned to take a decision on the said aspect in accordance with the mandates under the provisions of the R.P Act. As regards the request for providing postal vote facility to the Purappeda Santhis of various temples in the State of Kerala including Melsanthis of Sabarimala and Malikappuram temples, it is stated that in view of Rule 16 of Conduct of Elections Rules, 1961, it is impermissible in law to grant the said relief. Rule 18 thereunder provides the categories of persons who are entitled to vote by post in a parliamentary or assembly election in any constituency. In short, raising such contentions, the first respondent seeks for dismissal of the writ petition.