(1.) The plaintiffs are the revision petitioners.
(2.) The suit is for recovery of the plaint schedule property with arrears of rent. The pleadings disclose that the plaint schedule property with a house, cinema hall and the land appurtenant thereto was let out to the respondent on 15-10-1967 on a rental of Rs. 300/- per month. The property sought to be recovered is more particularly described in 'B' schedule. B schedule property forms part of 'A' schedule property. The first defendant in his written statement has inter alia, contended-which alone is relevant for the purpose of considering the dispute in the revision petition-that be is entitled to the benefit of S.106 KLR. Act. In support of this plea he has stated in the written statement thus:-
(3.) The question whether the lease in question partakes of the character of a lease within the meaning of S.106 KLR. Act, has been referred to the Land Tribunal by the court below by the order under challenge.