(1.) This writ petition is filed by the petitioner seeking to quash Exts.P4 and P13, whereby the permission sought for by the petitioner to transfer the land in favour of a third person is declined by stating that petitioner is entitled to transfer, however, on lease arrangement, and the transferee is to execute a lease in favour of the statutory authority. Material facts for the disposal of the writ petition are as follows:
(2.) Petitioner was allotted with an industrial plot on 26.06.1979. According to the petitioner, the document in respect of the allotment was lost and thereupon, petitioner submitted a fresh application, to which, Ext.P1 is issued, which is a document recognizing the allotment of the plot to the petitioner. Thereafter, Ext.P2 agreement was executed by and between the parties, wherein Clauses 10 and 11 read as follows:
(3.) In accordance with the said covenants, petitioner has applied for patta and as per the application, Ext.P15 recommendation was made by the Director of Industries & Commerce. However, patta is not issued so far. Petitioner has submitted Ext.P3 application for permission to transfer the plot to a third person. However, the same was declined as per Ext.P4 order, which is re-affirmed as per Ext.P13 order. It is in this background, this writ petition is filed by the petitioner seeking the following reliefs: