LAWS(KER)-2007-1-96

M K VIJAYAN NAIR Vs. E V PRAKASHAN

Decided On January 19, 2007
M.K.VIJAYAN NAIR Appellant
V/S
E.V.PRAKASHAN Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) This revision petition is directed against the concurrent verdict of guilty, conviction and sentence in a prosecution under Section 138 of the N.I. Act.

(2.) When this revision petition came up for hearing, it is submitted at the Bar by counsel for the rival contestants that the matter has been settled and the offence has been compounded by the complainant. A joint compromise petition duly signed by the rival contestants and counter signed by their respective counsel is also filed. The learned counsel for the respondent/complainant vouches that the signature appearing in the application for composition is that of the complainant.

(3.) The offence under Section 138 of the N.I. Act is now compoundable after the amendment to the N.I. Act. I am satisfied, from the submissions made at the Bar and the joint statement filed by them, that the parties have settled their dispute amicably. I find no reason not to accept the composition.