LAWS(KER)-2007-3-39

ROSAMMA MATHAI Vs. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE

Decided On March 12, 2007
ROSAMMA, D/O. MATHAI Appellant
V/S
SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) In this Petition filed under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. the petitioners, who are accused Nos.1 and 2 in Crime No.37/2007 of Alakode Police Station for offences punishable under Secs.324, 342 and 326 read with section 34 I.P.C., seek anticipatory bail.

(2.) I heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Public Prosecutor.

(3.) Having regard to the nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioners and the other circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, a direction is issued to the officer-in-charge of the police station concerned to release the petitioners on bail for a period of one month in the event of their arrest in connection with the above case on each of them executing a bond for Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction to the said officer and subject to the following conditions: a. Petitioners shall make themselves available for interrogation as and when required by the Investigating Officer. b. Petitioners shall not influence or intimidate the prosecution witnesses nor shall they attempt to tamper with the evidence for the prosecution. c. Petitioners shall not commit any offence while on bail. d. Petitioners shall surrender before the Magistrate concerned and seek regular bail in the meanwhile. If the petitioners commit breach of any of the above conditions, the bail granted to them shall be liable to be cancelled. This application is allowed as above.