(1.) The grievance of the petitioner is that C.W.6 - a Medical Officer, who had allegedly examined him and treated him, has not been examined by the learned Magistrate, though he was cited as a witness. He was not examined at the stage of the prosecution evidence. Subsequently, an application was filed to recall C.W.6. Even thereafter, he has not been examined. This, in short, is the grievance raised by the petitioner - the complainant.
(2.) The accused persons are police officials and the allegation of the petitioner is that he was illegally assaulted and tortured by the accused persons.
(3.) The respondents have been served through their counsel who appeared before the court below. They have not chosen to enter appearance. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that examination of C.W.6 is absolutely essential for a proper disposal of the complaint filed by the petitioner. The learned Magistrate erred grossly in not summoning C.W.6 and in not ensuring the presence of the witness. Even assuming that the complainant had not taken necessary steps, this was certainly a fit case where the powers under Sec.311 of the Cr.P.C. should have been invoked and insistence must have been made on the examination of C.W.6.