LAWS(KER)-2025-5-65

SETHULAKSHMI Vs. CANARA BANK

Decided On May 22, 2025
Sethulakshmi Appellant
V/S
CANARA BANK Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The unnumbered Civil Revision Petition was posted before the Court on noting defect by the Registry. The defect noted was as follows:

(2.) It was answered by the counsel as follows:

(3.) This is the circumstance under which the case was posted before the Bench as unnumbered CRP. On considering the primary stage, this court was also of the opinion that CRP was not maintainable. However, upon the decision in Ayub Khan P.A. v. State of Kerala and Another [2012 (1) KHC 615], being pointed out, the Registry was directed to number the CRP, since the question of maintainability is to be decided by the Court and not by the Registry. For that purpose, a detailed hearing is required. Therefore, when the matter was posted again, Adv.G.Krishnakumar was appointed as Amicus Curiae in this case on 2/4/2024.