(1.) In both the writ petitions, the petitioner raises identical issues against the same set of respondents. This Court has accordingly proposed to dispose of both the writ petitions through a common judgment.
(2.) The petitioner, a distillery, requires Extra Neutral Alcohol (ENA) as one of the raw materials for the purpose of manufacturing liquor. It has, in fact, periodically obtained permits to import ENA, which is not a portable spirit and not suited for human consumption.
(3.) In W.P.(C)No.375/2009, the petitioner distillery could not use six import permits having the validity period up to 23.08.2008. Similarly, in W.P.(C)No.423/2009 it could not use six more permits with different dates of validity.