LAWS(KER)-2015-7-166

BALAKRISHNAN NAIR AND ORS. Vs. CHANDRAN AND ORS.

Decided On July 07, 2015
Balakrishnan Nair And Ors. Appellant
V/S
Chandran And Ors. Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The Registry has raised an objection that since the appeal is filed under the provisions of the Family Court Act read with Guardian and Wards Act, the period of limitation for filing the appeal is 30 days, Section 19(3) of the Family Court Act. The counsel for the appellants relied on a decision of this Court in Viswanathan v. Sindhu, 2009 4 KerLT 312 stating that the provisions of Hindu Marriage Act will apply and the period of limitation has to be reckoned as 90 days as provided under Section 28(4) of the Hindu Marriage Act and that was how the matter has come before us for consideration.

(2.) Heard counsel for the appellants in extenso.

(3.) Counsel for the appellants submitted that the rights of Hindus in respect of marriage, guardianship, adoption and maintenance and succession etc. are governed by Hindu Code consists of four enactments namely the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, the Hindu Minority & Guardianship Act, 1956, the Hindu Adoptions & Maintenance Act, 1956 and the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 respectively. Earlier the guardianship of minor is being considered by the District Court and appeal lies to the High Court and the period of limitation was governed by Article 116 of the Limitation Act namely 90 days. Further, Section 2 of the Hindu Minority & Guardianship Act, 1956 says that it is in addition to, and not, save as hereafter expressly provided in, derogation of the Guardian and Wards Act, 1890. Section 5 of the Act is having certain overriding effect in respect of certain aspects prevailing prior to coming into force of this Act. All these aspects were considered by this Court in "Viswanathan's case and observed that period of limitation provided under Section 28(4) of the Hindu Marriage Act has to be reckoned for filing appeal in preference to Section 19(3) of the Family Court Act. So According to him, the appeal is filed within time. Counsel for the appellants submitted that if the court feels that the objection raised by the Registry is sustainable, an opportunity may be given to them to file an application to condone the delay in filing the appeal.