(1.) RFA 594/2012 arises from OS 43/2007. The suit is one for specific performance of an agreement for sale with an alternate prayer for return of advance sale consideration. Specific performance was declined, and the suit was decreed for return of advance. The plaintiff is in appeal.
(2.) RFA 600/2012 arises from OS 58/2007 which is a cross suit for mandatory injunction to vacate the premises. The defendant, who is the plaintiff in the suit for specific performance, is the appellant.
(3.) As noticed, the parties to the suit are the same and the suits are filed against each other. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to according to their status in the suit for specific performance. The defendant/respondent died pending the appeal. His legal heirs have been impleaded as additional respondents.