ABDUL KAREEM A.M., ALANGATTUKARAN HOUSE, MALA P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT AND NOORJAHAN P.H., W/O. ABDUL KAREEM A.M. Vs. P. PERIYA SAMY, ELAMPULIAMPALAYAM, KALAPARIKADU, VARAGURAMPATTY, ANDIPALAYAM POST, THIRUCHENGODU, TAMILNADU AND ORS.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE appellants are the parents of one Muhammed Shiyas who met with his death in a road traffic accident on 29.6.1995. The accident occurred while the rear side of the bus by which he was travelling was hit by a lorry proceeding behind. The second respondent was the driver of the lorry. Attributing negligence against the second respondent, the learned Tribunal awarded a sum of Rs. 1,24,750/ - as compensation together with interest at 7% per annum. This was against the claim of Rs. 4,50,000/ -. As the 3rd respondent Insurance Company admitted the policy of the lorry, they were directed to pay the compensation. In this appeal, the adequacy of compensation is under challenge. We have heard both sides. The main grievance voiced against the award is that the appellants were not awarded adequate compensation for loss of dependency. The deceased was aged 19 at the time of the accident. For computing the compensation for loss of dependency, the learned Tribunal fixed notionally the monthly income of the deceased at Rs. 1250/ -. As the accident was in the year 1995, we feel justified in fixing the notional income of the deceased at Rs. 1750/ -. As the deceased was unmarried, we lean ourselves to the multiplier applicable to the age group of the mother, who is younger among the parents. The second appellant who is the mother was aged 42 years at the time of the accident. The correct multiplier applicable to the age group of the second appellant is 14. As the deceased was unmarried, one half of the amount has to be deducted in consideration of the expenses which the deceased would have incurred had he been alive. When the dependency compensation is recalculated as above, it will stand enhanced to Rs. 1,47,000/ -. As the learned Tribunal has awarded only Rs. 1 lakh, we award to the appellants an additional sum of Rs. 47,000/ -.

(2.) THE death was instantaneous. The learned Tribunal has awarded a sum of Rs. 7500/ - as compensation for pain and suffering. As we feel inadequacy in the compensation awarded, we award an additional sum of Rs. 2500/ - to the appellants towards pain and suffering.

(3.) THE learned Tribunal was miserly in awarding compensation for funeral expenses also. We award an additional sum of Rs. 3000/ - under that head.