(1.) THE State challenges the judgment of acquittal passed in c. C. No. 35 of 1994 by the Sessions Court, Ernakulam.
(2.) THE said case involved offence under S. 3 (1) (x) of the scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.
(3.) THE learned Government Pleader submitted that there is sufficient corroboration to the evidence of PW 1 forthcoming from PW9 though a subordinate of PW1 and that in the circumstances the trial court's judgment is unjustified.