(1.) These two appeals involve the question as to whether the High Court, in exercise of its writ jurisdiction under Art.226 of the Constitution, should interfere with a detention order not actually executed and served on the detenu.
(2.) The facts necessary to appreciate the contentions urged in these two appeals are as under:
(3.) An order of detention was passed on 23.1.1996 vide, Ext. R2(a), in the following terms: