J DEVAKI Vs. T SANTHOSH

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Alleging non compliance of the direction issued by this Court in Annexure A1 judgment, this Contempt of Court Case has been filed. The writ petition was filed by the Petitioner alleging that the Corporation was bound to reconstruct a compound wall which was demolished for enabling the Corporation to put up concrete slabs over the drainage. Ultimately, the matter were settled as per the decision reflected in the minutes, a copy of which was produced as Ext.P3 in the writ petition. This Court therefore directed the parties that in terms of the decision taken in Ext.P3, the first Respondent will complete the construction within a period of three weeks from the date of production of a copy of this judgment. A review petition was filed on behalf of the Respondent which was dismissed by this Court.

(2.) It is the allegation of the Petitioner herein that while reconstructing the compound wall, the direction in the judgment have not been fully complied with and the implementation is not in tune with the conditions provided in Ext.P3.

(3.) The Respondent has filed a counter affidavit and the Petitioner has filed a reply affidavit also. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner invited my attention to the details of Ext.P3 and the photographs produced along with the affidavit to contend for the position that now the compound wall has been constructed leaving a width of 2 ft. from the concrete slabs. It is stated that this is in violation of the conditions provided in Ext.P3.