SREEJESH P T Vs. STATE OF KERALA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The petitioner is now working as Night Watchman in Panampally Memorial Government College, Chalakudy. He was appointed on 9.6.2010 as per Ext.P1 order. It is stated that as per Ext.P1, the petitioner joined service on 19.6.2010. The petitioner states that when Ext.P1 order of appointment was issued, he was undergoing Post Graduate Course (MA) in Kerala Responsible Ayurvedic Tourism & Educational Resource under the Sree Sankaracharya University of Sanskrit, Kalady. Since the petitioner got a job of Night Watchman, he could not abandon the same in view of his financial hardships. At the same time, he desires to complete his course. It is stated in paragraph 3 of the Writ Petition that duty time of the petitioner is from 4.30 p.m. to 8.30 p.m. The learned Government Pleader submitted that duty hours of the petitioner is from 4.30 p.m to 9.30 a.m. on the next day. The petitioner submitted Ext.P2 representation dated 24.7.2000 to the first respondent praying that the petitioner may be permitted to continue the Post Graduate Course. In Ext.P2, it is stated that his duty time is from "4.30 to 8.30 in the evening". It is stated in Ext.P2 that attending the course would not in any way affect his duty as Night Watchman. It is also stated that 3rd Semester of the course has commenced. The petitioner assured in Ext.P2 that any permission that may be granted to continue to attend the course would not be made use of by him for gaining any advantage like transfer. Ext.P2 is not disposed of.

(2.) The reliefs prayed for in the Writ Petition are the following:

(3.) The authority to grant permission as prayed for in Ext.P2 is the Government. Ext.P2 has not been disposed of. Therefore,it is not proper to issue a writ of mandamus as prayed for in relief No.(i). However, the relief prayed for in relief No.(ii) can be granted. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the Writ Petition is disposed of as follows: