REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

ARVIND ALIAS CHHOTU Appellant

V/S

STATE Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH VS. SHYAM BEHARI AND ANR. [REFERRED TO]
DEONANDAN MISHRA VS. STATE OF BIHAR [REFERRED TO]
ANANT BHUJANGRAO KULKARNI VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF WEST BENGAL VS. MIRA MOHAMMAD OMAR [REFERRED TO]
MOHIBUR RAHMAN VS. STATE OF ASSAM [REFERRED TO]
BODH RAJ VS. STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR [REFERRED TO]
BABU S O RAVEENDRAN VS. BABU S O BAHULEYAN [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF U P VS. SATISH [REFERRED TO]
DEEPAK CHANDRAKANT PATIL VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF U P VS. DESH RAJ [REFERRED TO]
RAMREDDY RAJESHKHANNA REDDY VS. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF GOA VS. SANJAY THAKRAN [REFERRED TO]
VENKATESAN VS. STATE OF TAMIL NADU [REFERRED TO]
VITHAL EKNATH ADLINGE VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE above captioned four appeals are being disposed of by a common judgment and order; not for the reason all appeals arise out of a common judgment, but on account of the fact that issue of law which arise for consideration in the appeals is the same.

(2.) IN Crl. A. No. 362/2001 and Crl. A. No. 236/2003, the impugned judgment and order is dated 9. 10. 2000. The impugned judgment and order in Crl. A. No. 366/2001 and crl. A. No. 490/2001 is dated 15. 7. 2000.

(3.) ON the solitary evidence, of being last seen in the company of the deceased, the appellants have been convicted.

Click here to view full judgment.

ARVIND ALIAS CHHOTU Vs. STATE

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address