VINOD KUMAR Vs. STATE

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The present petition has been filed under Sec. 439 Cr.PC for seeking interim bail for a period of 30 days in case FIR No. 225/2013 under section 302/323/201/34 Penal Code registered at Police Station - Samaipur Badli.

(2.) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in judicial custody since 09.05.2013 and out of 33 witnesses, all the material witnesses have been examined including the complainant PW-7 Jasbir Singh; that the family of the petitioner is facing severe financial crunch specially children (one daughter and one son), whose studies are being hampered due to non-deposit of fee; that vide order dated 10.07.2017 passed by this Court, the petitioner was granted 30 days interim bail for arrangement of financial help to his family; that petitioner never misused the liberty of bail granted to him earlier and surrendered on time except on one occasion as he had to fulfil all formalities of educational loan applied for his children; that petitioner is sole bread earner of his family and he wants to dispose of his property at Chattisgarh to meet all daily needs and education expenses of his children.

(3.) Learned APP for the State vehemently opposed the bail of the petitioner and prays that looking to the criminal delinquency attributed to the petitioner and his previous conduct, he is not at all entitled to be enlarged on interim bail.