KUSUM BALA Vs. STATE AND ORS.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Crl.M.A. 1239/2017

(2.) An appeal against the judgment of the learned Metropolitan Magistrate dated 1st June, 2015 was also dismissed vide the impugned judgment dated 29th Sept., 2016. Hence the present revision petition. As noted above, the two Courts below have applied themselves on facts and law and a concurrent finding of two Courts is against the complainant. In a revision petition this Court would interfere only if there is a gross illegality in the impugned judgments.

(3.) Learned counsel for the petitioner to press his claim submits that though the learned Trial Court disbelieved the evidence of the prosecution with respect to the offence punishable under Sec. 354 IPC, however there is no finding returned with regard to Sec. 452 IPC.