G.B. INTERNATIONAL Vs. UNION OF INDIA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Issue notice. Mr. Sanjeev Narula, Advocate accepts notice. With consent, the petition was heard finally for disposal.

(2.) The writ petitioner seeks directions for release of its goods and the quashing of an order made by the Commissioner on 29-11-2016. The writ petitioner had filed a bill of entry on 2-11-2016 in respect of quantities of "PU Coated Polyester Fabric", "Non-Textured and Polyester Linen Fabric (other than upholstery fabric)" and 5000 pieces of "Suction Pump", imported from China. The goods were seized on 10-11-2016 when the customs authorities were of the opinion that the importer/petitioner had undervalued the imported goods. The petitioner sought provisional release of the goods, which resulted in the impugned order whereby the Commissioner - as a pre-condition for release, directed deposit of 100% differential duty or bank guarantee for the same amount, besides imposing certain other conditions. The petitioner contends that having regard to the nature of the goods and the circumstances, and that the samples were drawn, imposition of such an onerous condition is unwarranted and arbitrary.

(3.) Counsel for the respondents, on the other hand, contends that the petitioner has the appellate remedy in case it is aggrieved and that the customs authorities cannot be faulted with for having imposed what are the standard conditions.