(1.) THIS Revision Petition challenges the order dated 27.7.2005.
(2.) BY the impugned order, suit filed by the plaintiff who is petitioner herein was dismissed.
(3.) HENCE , this present revision petition. 5. Petitioner contended that the provisions of Section 35-B are directory and that in the event of non-payment of costs on the next date of hearing, the Court was not empowered to debar a party from prosecuting the suit or the defence as the case may be. Petitioner contended that since cross- examination of DW-2 was allowed subject to payment of costs, learned Trial Court ought to have declined only the liberty to cross-examine DW-2 and should not have dismissed the suit of the plaintiff.