QAMR UD DIN Vs. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The short question that arises in this second appeal is whether the property in dispute is a part of graveyard and vested in the Union of India or whether the Wakf Board is the owner of the property. The Courts below have recorded a concurrent finding of fact that the property namely field No. 319 was never a graveyard though it was a part of khasra No. 386. Consequently the suit of the plaintiff-appellant stood dismissed with costs, and the appeal was also dismissed with costs.

(2.) The brief facts leading to the second appeal are that the appellants had filed a suit in 1954 against Delhi Improvement Trust for permanent injunction restraining the Delhi Improvement Trust from disturbing and ousting the appellant from the disputed plot and from dismentalling and demolishing the Dhobi Ghat and other structures existing on the disputed plot. At that time, the suit was instituted by appellant No. 2 and at a later stage Delhi Wakf Board was substituted and was transposed son being defendant No. 2 to plaintiff No. 1. The appellants had alleged that the disputed plot bearing municipal No. XIV/4365 situated in Mohalla Qasabpura, Delhi is a part of big plot and measures I bighas and 2 biswas was graveyard having been dedicated from the time immemorial for that purpose. According to the plaintiffs, this property was a part of khasra No. 472. of the settlement of 1864 which corresponded to khasra No. 386 of the settlement of 1880.

(3.) The defendant in the suit were the Delhi Development Authority and the Union of India. The suit was contested and it was pleaded that the disputed plot was a part of Khasra No. 319 of the last settlement of 1925 which khasra was owned by the Union of India and the management of which had been entrusted by the Union of India to the Delhi Development Authority and that the plaintiffs have no locus standi and had no cause of action for filing the suit.