LAWS(DLH)-2016-9-407

SHEELU RAM Vs. PRADEEP JOHN & ORS

Decided On September 22, 2016
Sheelu Ram Appellant
V/S
Pradeep John And Ors Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) This Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed impugning the concurrent Judgments of the courts below; of the Trial Court dated 3.1.2012 and the First Appellate Court dated 8.9.2014; by which the suit filed by the appellant/plaintiff for injunction and possession was dismissed with respect to the suit property bearing flat no. 319. DDA Flats, Block-E, Type A, Pocket 3, Bindapur, Dwarka, New Delhi.

(2.) The case of the appellant/plaintiff as per the plaint was that the suit property was owned by respondent no.3/defendant no. 3/Sh. Pramod John. Respondent no.1/defendant no. 1/Sh. Pradeep John is the brother of respondent no.3/defendant no. 3/Sh. Pramod John. Respondent no. 2/defendant no. 2/Smt. Sonia is the wife of respondent no.1/ defendant no.1. Appellant/plaintiff claims to have purchased rights in the suit property from respondent no.3/defendant no.3 by means of transfer documents being Agreement to Sell, General Power of Attorney, Receipt, etc, dated 25.1.2006, Ex.PW1/2 to PW1/4. Original owner of the suit property was one Sh. M.P. Raheja and who has transferred rights in the suit property to the defendant no. 3 by virtue of the documents dated 24.1.2001. Plaintiff pleads that defendant no. 1 being the brother of defendant no. 3 and defendant no. 2 being the wife of defendant no. 1 were allowed by defendant no. 3 to reside in the property on gratuitous license basis.

(3.) Only respondent no.2/defendant no.2, wife of defendant no. 1 and the sister-in-law of defendant no. 3 contested the suit. Defendant no. 2 pleaded that the house was her matrimonial house and she was allowed to have this matrimonial home in view of a family Settlement in the family dated 10.2.2005. The suit was hence prayed to be dismissed.