(1.) THE appeal is directed against the judgment dated 19.09.2013 passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) whereby compensation of Rs.13,88,333/ - was granted in favour of the Respondents/Claimants for the death of Amar Singh who died in a motor vehicular accident which occurred on 30.11.2012.
(2.) DURING inquiry before the Claims Tribunal, it was claimed that the deceased was working as a mason and was earning Rs.15,000/ - per month. In the absence of any documentary evidence with regard to the deceased's income, the Claims Tribunal took minimum wages of a skilled worker, added 50% towards inflation, deducted 1/4th towards personal and living expenses and applied multiplier of 13 to compute the loss of dependency as Rs.11,03,333/ -. The overall compensation awarded in para 21 of the award is tabulated hereunder: - <FRM>JUDGEMENT_467_LAWS(DLH)1_2015.htm</FRM>
(3.) IT is urged by the learned counsel for the Appellant that in view of the judgment in HDFC ERGO General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Smt. Lalta Devi and Ors., MAC. APP. 189/2014 decided on 12.01.2015, it was not permissible to grant future prospects in the absence of any evidence with regard to future prospects. It is further urged that a sum of Rs.50,000/ - awarded towards gratuitous services was not tenable.