(1.) Present revision petition has been preferred by the petitioner to challenge the legality and correctness of an order dated 03.06.2015 of learned Addl. Sessions Judge in Crl.A. No.8/14 titled 'Pankaj Murgai vs. Neeraj Lijhara', whereby order dated 04.01.2014 of learned Metropolitan Magistrate in Complaint Case No.1285/1/07 under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act was upheld.
(2.) Under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act, the petitioner was sentenced to undergo SI for four months with compensation Rs. 25,000/-. The complainant / respondent No.2 with his counsel has reported that the matter has been settled with the petitioner and pursuant to the settlement, he has received the settled / agreed amount. He has no objection to the disposal of the revision petition as settled / compounded.
(3.) Since the matter has been settled amicably with the free consent of the complainant, the revision petition stands disposed of as settled / compounded. The petitioner is acquitted.