PARAMJEET SINGH KHURANA Vs. PUNJAB AND SIND BANK

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THERE are heights of dishonesty with certain litigants such as the petitioner resort to, and which besides causing gross wastage of judicial time also causes unnecessary expenditure to a respondent and which in this case is Punjab and Sind Bank. This I am saying so in view of the present facts of the case which are detailed below for dismissing this writ petition.

(2.) THE petitioner by this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeks the relief of direction against the respondent/Bank to quash the order dated 20.4.2012 by which the amounts due to the petitioner towards terminal dues were adjusted towards various amounts due from the petitioner towards various loans repayable to the respondent/Bank. This letter dated 20.4.2012 reads as under: -

(3.) IT is therefore clear that the respondent/Bank has partly adjusted the amounts which were due to the petitioner against the claim of the loan accounts of the respondent/Bank against the petitioner, and total of which is not satisfied, and therefore the respondent/Bank may have to possibly file recovery proceedings. Therefore, under no circumstances it can be held that actions of the respondent/Bank are illegal and unjustified in adjusting the terminal dues of the petitioner against dues payable by the petitioner to the respondent/Bank towards various loan amounts.