LAWS(DLH)-1994-12-70

SHAKTI SINGH Vs. STATE

Decided On December 15, 1994
SHAKTI SINGH Appellant
V/S
STATE OF DELHI Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Shakti Singh s/o Bhagwana, Ashok Kumar s/o Bhagwana,both residents of A2/50-51, Sultan Puri, Delhi and Zile Singh s/o Sardare residentof A2/273 Sultanpuri, Delhi stand convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge ofDelhi in Session's Case No. 38/90 for the offences punishable under Sections 147,148,188 and 302 read with Sections 149,201 read with Sections 149,395 read withSection 149 and 395 read with Section 149. Each of them is sentenced to sufferrigorous imprisonment for one year under Section 147, rigorous imprisonment fortwo years under Section 148, rigorous imprisonment for three months underSection 188, rigorous imprisonment for three years under Section 201 read withSection 149, rigorous imprisonment for five years and to pay a fine of Rs. 12,000each and in default of payment of fine further rigorous imprisonment for 2 yearsunder Section 395 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code.

(2.) The appellants were challaned in FIR No. 254/84 on the allegations that on 2/11/1984 at about 6.30 A.M. they and other 37-47 persons had formedan unlawful assembly with the common object of looting and murdering and at thattime they were armed with deadly weapons and in the prosecution of the saidcommon object they committed murders of Inder Singh, Hardeep Singh, DalipSngh, Prabhu Singh, Paitu Singh, Shanti Kaur, Sangat Singh and Badam Singh andthey further destroyed the evidence of murder by burning the dead bodies of thosepersons and that they had looted the houses of those persons and had also set onfire the houses of those persons.

(3.) The charge was framed against the appellants on 30/05/1987 foroffences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 188, 201 read with Section 149,395read with Section 149 and 302 read with Section 149 for which the appellants hadpleaded not guilty of the charge. Their evidence is of total denial and falseimplication. According to them as a matter of fact they were the neighbours of thevictims and they had gone to save them and that they have been falsely implicatedat the instance of the police.