RAVINDER KUMAR Vs. STATE

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Crl. M.A. 5692/2014

(2.) Respondent No. 2 is father of minor, whose name is being withheld, is identified by the learned counsel and the investigating officer. Respondent No. 2 on his behalf and on behalf of minor states that the matter has been settled between the parties as per the deed of settlement dated 31st March, 2014, copy of which has been filed before this Court at page 28 to 31 and is Ex. 'C'. He states that the settlement has been arrived at between the Petitioner and Respondent No. 2, father of the complainant, of their own free will, volition, without coercion and seeing the overall welfare and interest of the minor. As the Petitioner has undertaken to abide by the terms of settlement, Respondent No. 2 and the complainant do not wish to pursue the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. The complainant who is a minor is also present in Court and is identified by the learned counsel and the investigating officer. She reiterates the version of her father.

(3.) The Petitioner who is present in Court and is identified by the learned counsel and the investigating officer states that he will abide by the terms of settlement arrived at between the parties and also the undertaking filed by him at page 32 of the Petition. He states that he would deposit a sum of Rs. 5 lakhs with the Juvenile Justice Fund within one week. He also states that he would leave the country within one week and will make no communication of any kind whatsoever whether telephonically or by social networking websites, or electronic/non-electronic medium to the complainant/minor. He states that the settlement has been arrived between the Petitioner and Respondent No. 2 out of his own free will, volition, without any threat, pressure or coercion.