(1.) BY this Regular Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) challenge is laid to the two concurrent judgments of the courts below; of the trial court dated 20.7.2011 and the first appellate court dated 21.11.2013; by which the suit of the respondent/plaintiff/mother -in -law for permanent and mandatory injunction has been decreed against the appellant/defendant/daughter -in -law.
(2.) THE courts below have relied upon the judgment of the Supreme Court reported as S.R. Batra & Anr. Vs. Smt. Taruna Batra (2007) 3 SCC 169 which holds that a daughter -in -law has no right of residence in the house of the mother -in -law or the father -in -law, and which house of the mother -in -law or the father -in -law is not a shared household with the daughter -in -law, so as to claim a right of residence therein by the daughter -in -law. I may also note that the Division Bench of this Court in the case of Shumita Didi Sandhu Vs. Sanjay Singh Sandhu & Ors. 174 (2010) DLT 79 (DB) has also followed the aforesaid judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of S.R. Batra (supra) and held that the daughter -in -law will not have a right of residence in the house of mother -in -law or the father -in -law. The relevant paras of this judgment in the case of Shumita Didi Sandhu (supra) are paras 40, 41 and 45 to 48 and the same read as under: -
(3.) THE appeal is therefore dismissed, leaving the parties to bear their own costs.