NIRAJ KUMAR SINGH Vs. UNIVERSITY OF DELHI

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Rule D.B.The petitioner was a candidate for the post of a Lecturer in History inthe evening shift of Moti Lal Nehru College (Respondent No. 2).

(2.) The petitioner as well as respondent No. 5 and other candidatesbad applied for the post of Lecturer in History, pursuant to an advertisementwhich was published in the newspaper. The relevant portion of the saidadvertisement reads as follows :

(3.) In the interview which was conducted on 28th of September 1992,respondent No. 5 has been selected for being appointed to the said post ofLecturer in History.