(1.) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
(2.) Application is disposed of.
(3.) To appreciate the contention raised on behalf of the appellant, brief recapitulation of the facts is necessary. Respondent No.1/plaintiff had preferred the underlying suit for specific performance, injunction and recovery of money, thereby claiming that the appellant had executed a Receipt-Cum-Agreement dtd. 5/1/1994 in his favour with respect to 1/4 undivided share in land measuring 4 bighas 11 biswas in Khasra No.118, situated in Village Khera, Green Park, New Delhi.