NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD Vs. SHARDA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) PURSUANT to order dated 20.07.2012, Ms. Pooja Goel, ld. Counsel has made her appearance on behalf of the respondent nos. 1 to 4 and submitted that there is compensation amount granted in favour of the respondent no. 4 and the said respondent had expired after passing of the award. Therefore, she prayed that respondent no. 4 may be deleted from the array of the parties.

(2.) I ordered accordingly.

(3.) COUNSEL appearing on behalf of the appellant has argued that PW3 in his examination-in-chief has stated that deceased Bhagirath was his permanent employee whereas in his cross-examination he deposed that he used to pay salary only for those working days on which he worked. He used to deduct the amount for the leaves taken by the deceased.