LAWS(DLH)-2022-8-104

RITA WADHWA Vs. SANJEEV SARIN

Decided On August 18, 2022
Rita Wadhwa Appellant
V/S
Sanjeev Sarin Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The present case, unfortunately, deals with sibling rivalry which has brought to the fore the worst amongst them. There is much acrimony and bad blood between them. The parties to the proceeding are siblings (hereinafter referred as 'siblings') born out of the same parents, father- Mr. I.C. Jain and mother-Mrs. Madhurekha Sarin, who expired intestate on 23/1/1987 and 9/5/1999 respectively. Appellant is the sister of respondent Nos. 1 and 2.

(2.) As per the brief facts of the case set up in the appeal, on 9/1/2008 respondent No.1-brother (since deceased) instituted a suit for partition, rendition of accounts, declaration, permanent and mandatory injunction (hereinafter referred as 'suit') against the appellant-sister and respondent no.2-brother (since deceased) claiming partition and 1/3rd share of the entire estate of their deceased mother, including property bearing no. B-1/23, Vasant Vihar, New Delhi (hereinafter referred as 'property').

(3.) Upon service, respondent no.2 appeared and supported the case of respondent no.1, whereas appellant disputed and claimed ownership of the property on the basis of a photocopy of an alleged Will of their deceased mother in her favour. After completion of pleadings, numerous failed efforts for amicable resolution of disputes between parties through arbitration and mediation and recording of evidence, when the suit was listed for final arguments on 13/8/2019 after more than 11 years for adjudicating validity of the Will claimed to be executed by the deceased mother, learned counsel for appellant sought time to file written note on arguments of 15 pages and accordingly, the suit was adjourned for the next day, i.e. 14/8/2019. Learned Single Judge on 14/8/2019, after recording the terms of compromise inter se the parties through their respective counsels, passed the consent judgment and decree dtd. 14/8/2019 (hereinafter referred as 'impugned decree') holding in the relevant paragraphs as under:-