LAWS(DLH)-2012-2-170

VINOD KUMAR Vs. UNION OF INDIA

Decided On February 28, 2012
VINOD KUMAR Appellant
V/S
UNION OF INDIA Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE learned counsel for the respondents who appears on advance notice states that the petitioner has not exhausted the remedy of revision as contemplated under Rule 29 of the CRPF Rules, 1955.

(2.) THE learned counsel for the petitioner on instructions seeks to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to approach the Revisional authority in accordance with law. THE writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for.