LAWS(DLH)-2012-10-255

RIDHIMA JUNEJA Vs. DEVEN JUNEJA

Decided On October 30, 2012
RIDHIMA JUNEJA Appellant
V/S
STATE NCT OF DELHI Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) BOTH these petitions arose out of a complaint case under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005( in short 'the Act of 2005) though were filed against different orders of the trial Court and the appellate Court. Since both the petitions were heard together and common submissions were advanced at the Bar by the counsel for the parties the same are being disposed of together by this common order.

(2.) THE facts, in brief, leading to the filing of these petitions may be noticed at the outset. The petitioner in Crl/M.C.No.2748/10 (reference to whom shall now onwards be made as 'the petitioner- wife') and respondent no. 1 in that petition and who is the petitioner in Crl.Rev.P.No.148/098(who shall hereinafter be referred to as 'the respondent-husband') were married on 31st January, 2004. They celebrated their honeymoon in Australia, New Zealand and Thailand and on 2nd November, 2005 they were blessed with a son. However, the sweetness of their married life did not last long and within short time relations between them became bitter and so bitter that the petitioner-wife had to file a criminal complaint in Court in the year 2007 under Section 12 of the Act of 2005 against her husband and his parents and two sisters in which she had levelled allegations of physical and mental torture to her by her in-laws. Many reliefs were claimed in the complaint by the petitioner-wife including a right on residence in the property in Ashok Vihar which she claimed to be her matrimonial home and maintenance of Rs.1,50,000/- p.m. on the ground that he himself had been claiming that he was paying that much money to her as pocket money. In the complaint some interim reliefs including that of payment of Rs.50,000/- as interim maintenance during the pendency of the complaint were also claimed by the petitioner-wife.

(3.) THE learned Metropolitan Magistrate relying only upon the pleadings and the affidavits filed by the parties and the report of the Protection Officer disposed of the complaint finally vide order dated 5th September, 2007 and held respondent-husband only guilty of causing domestic violence to the petitioner-wife and certain directions were given to him including a direction for payment of compensation of Rs.50,000/- to her under Section 20 of the Act of 2005 for the acts of domestic violence committed by him and a sum of Rs.5000/-p.m. only as maintenance for the mother and son from the date of the complaint since the husband had offered to stay with her. However, no relief was given against his parents and two sisters. The relevant parts of that order are re- produced below:-