LAWS(DLH)-2011-12-278

CIT Vs. KAMDHENU STEEL & ALLOYS LTD

Decided On December 23, 2011
CIT Appellant
V/S
Kamdhenu Steel And Alloys Ltd Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The issue relating to the additions made by the Assessing Officer (AO) under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') on account of unexplained share application money is becoming mercurial and mercurial by the day. Though plethora of case law is available deciding various facets of this issue and the principles which are to be applied have almost been crystallized and pumped up by the series of decisions of the Apex Court and various High Courts, the issue keeps bouncing back with new dimensions and intricacies. In all these appeals, we are again confronted with the additions which were made by the AO under Section 68 of the Act. All these appeals, which pertain to different assessees, are filed by the Revenue as the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal?) has deleted the additions made by the Assessing Officer.

(2.) Before we embark upon the discussion on factual aspects, in the appeals, which prompted the AOs to make the additions, it would be appropriate to revisit the legal position as enunciated in various judgments interpreting the provisions of Section 68/69 of the Act. We may record that this very Bench had the occasion to deal with another batch of appeals touching upon this very issue, which culminated into judgment dated 31.1.2011 with lead case entitled CIT Vs. Oasis Hospitalities, 2011 333 ITR 119. As catena of judgments were taken note of and the ratio culled out therein after undertaking in-depth analysis, we are of the view that our purpose can be served by borrowing liberally from the said judgment to state the legal position. Some more cases which have been decided thereafter or cited before us now, but not taken note of in the said judgment would be added thereafter. Operative portion of that judgment reads as under:

(3.) As per the provisions of this Section, in case the assessee has not been able to give satisfactory explanation in respect of certain expenditure or where any sum is found credited in the books of accounts, the AO can treat the same as undisclosed income and add to the income of the assessee. The assessee is required to give satisfactory explanation about the "nature and source" of such sum found credited in the books of accounts.